http://doi.org/10.33698/NRF0272-Aparajita Guin, Karobi Das, Sunita Sharma, Abhishek Ghosh

ABSTRACT

Background: Addiction inuences performance of an individual as well as viability of his life. It also intensies the physical and psychological problems. From psychological perspective, the devastating inuence of substance addiction is exceptionally signicant as the major consequences not only cuddle the individual but also ruin the personality facets, social functioning, neighboring environment, family, friends, and overall quality of life. Objective: To assess self-esteem of the patients attending the DDTC unit of PGIMER, Chandigarh. Methodology: The descriptive study was conducted among 60 male patients with substance use disorder aged between 18-50 years by using Consecutive sampling technique in the DDTC unit, PGIMER, Chandigarh. The self-esteem of the patients was assessed from July to October, 2018 by interviewing the participants using an interview schedule comprising of a) socio demographic and clinical prole and b) Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Descriptive statistics (mean, frequency, percentage) were applied to analyze the data. Results: The participants were in the age range of 18-50 years with the mean age 30.45±8.59 years. One fourth of the participants had started abusing substance before 18 years. The mean age for starting substance abuse was 22.98±6.04 years and range varies from 12 years to 40 years. Majority of the participants (73%) had moderate self-esteem and one fourth of them reported to have low self- esteem. The mean self-esteem score of the participants was 22.17±4.49 with the range of 11-34. Conclusion: Patients with substance use disorder mostly have low or moderate self-esteem. Adolescent period is vulnerable for starting the substance abuse as reported in the present study.

Key words: Substance Use Disorder; Self-esteem.

Address of correspondence:

Dr. Karobi Das

Lecturer, Clinical psychology NINE, PGIMER, Chandigarh

Introduction:

Substance abuse refers to a form of malec or hazardous use of any substances in order to lighten the mood. Substances include any kind of psychoactive substances such as alcohol or drugs may be illegal or not and some other substances that may not be drugs typically. Abuse can be the result of unfair usage of any substance in such a way that is not recommended, inscribed or prescribed.1According to WHO (World Health Organization), “substance abuse is persistent or sporadic drug use inconsistent with or unrelated to acceptable medical practice”.2

In India, the commonest used substance is alcohol (80-90%) followed by using cannabis (4-20%). Nearly more than half of the males reported using substances once or more in their lifetime. But the type and percentage of substance abuse varies from region to region. About 70% people are using some or the other substance daily. It was found that in the rural community of Uttar Pradesh 38.3% were habitual substance users. In the rural population of Bihar, it shows the prevalence of drug use was 28.8%.3-5 While investigating about the contributory factors of substance abuse, self-esteem has been identied as an important contributory factor to substance use as well as substance abuse. According to Rogers self-esteem is the self-valuing and acceptance of oneself. How much worthy or valuable a person is in his/her own eyes that we can refer to as self-esteem. It is a dynamic concept and largely inuenced by signicant others in one’s life.6

According to Kaplan’s Theory a person with low self-esteem is more prone to committing asocial behavior like substance abuse. Moreover, several studies concluded that low self-regard is a key factor of social incompatibilities of an individual. The individual who has control over their life seems to be mentally healthy, they consider themselves to be a worthy living, have high self-esteem that leads to a favorable quality of life comparing to those who lacks such control over their life.7 To date, research on self-esteem among the patients with substance abuse is scarce, though available literature is there regarding self-esteem among specic substance users like alcoholics or cannabis users. So, the researcher attempts to assess the self-esteem of the patients with substance use disorder in the present study.

Objective:

To assess self-esteem of the patients attending the DDTC unit of PGIMER, Chandigarh.

Materials and Methods:

A descriptive study was done to assess the self-esteem of the patients attending the DDTC unit of PGIMER, Chandigarh from July to October 2018. Total 60 patients with substance use disorders, selected from DDTC unit, PGIMER, Chandigarh by using consecutive sampling technique, were enrolled in the study. Tool used for data collection was an Interview schedule comprising of a) socio demographic & clinical prole and b) Rosenberg self- esteem scale. For assessing self-esteem Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale was used. It is a standardized ten item Likert scale with items answerable on a four-point scale – from strongly agree to strongly disagree. It has total 10 items, among which 5 are positive and another 5 are negative items. For positive items (1, 3, 4, 7& 10) the scoring was 4 for strongly agree, 3 for agree, 2 for disagree and 1 for strongly disagree. For the negative items (2,5,6,8 & 9) the scoring was reverse. Scores of the individual items are summed to obtain the total score. The total scores are interpreted as follows: 10 to 20 score was interpreted as Low self-esteem, 20 to 33 was moderate Self-esteem and 33 to 40 was High self- esteem. “Higher the score, higher the self- esteem.” The tool was available in the open domain. Ethical permission was taken from the Institute Ethics Committee, PGIMER, Chandigarh.  Participants  were  made comfortable during the interview and interview was done only after taking informed consent from them. Interview was conducted in a separate room of DDTC unit for duration of 20-30 minutes for each patient. Descriptive statistics (mean, frequency, percentage) were applied to analyze the data. participants (92%) were taking the substances on a daily basis, 43% reported that they used to spent less than Rs. 500 per day for buying substance, whereas 35% used to spent more than Rs.2000/- per day for substance(s). 50% participants had the previous history of drug de addiction

Table 1: Socio Demographic Profile

Sl.

No.

Variables n(%)
1. Age (In years)

18-27

28-37

“38

 

28(46.7)

18(30.0)

14(23.3)

2. Educational status Primary education Secondary education Higher Secondary

Graduate & above.

 

6(01.0)

18(30.0)

19(31.7)

17(28.3)

3. Occupation Professional/semiprofessional Skilled worker

Unskilled worker Unemployed

10(16.7)

14(23.3)

21(35.0)

15(25.0)

4. Marital status

Single

Married

29(48.3)

31(51.7)

5. Per capita income

“5000

>5000-10000

>10000-15000

>15000-20000

>20000

17(28.3)

22(36.7)

5( 8.3)

4( 6.7)

12(20.0)

6. Religion

Hindu Muslim Sikh

 

26(43.3)

3(05.0)

31(51.7)

7. Locality

Rural

Urban/Semi urban

 

24(40.0)

36(60.0)

8. Type of family

Nuclear Joint/Extended

 

31(51.7)

29(48.3)

9. Family history of substance abuse 10(16.7)

 

Results:

T h e s o c i o d e m o g r a p h i c d a t a summarized in Table 1 shows that participants were in the age group of 18-50 years with the mean age of 30.45±8.59 years. One third (32%) participants were educated up to the higher secondary level, 25% participants were unemployed and 35 % were unskilled worker. Half of the participants were married. One third of them had per capita income within a range of Rs. 6000-10000. More than half of the participants (51.7%) belonged to Hindu community. Almost one third of the participants were resident of an urban/semi urban area. Almost half of the participants were from joint families and 16.7% participants had a positive family history of substance abuse.

Table 2 shows half of the participants (50%) were multiple substance abusers, 30% are alcohol abusers, 18.4% were Opioid abusers. One fourth of the participants had started abusing substance in the age of less than 18 years. The mean age for starting substance abuse was 22.98±6.04 years and range varies from 12 years to 40 years. Most of the participants (around 60%) were abusing the substance(s) from more than 5 years. The mean duration for substance abuse was 8.80±7.71 with a wide range of 2

of the Participants

Sl.

No.

Variables n(%)
1. Age (In years)

18-27

28-37

“38

 

28(46.7)

18(30.0)

14(23.3)

2. Educational status Primary education Secondary education Higher Secondary

Graduate & above.

 

6(01.0)

18(30.0)

19(31.7)

17(28.3)

3. Occupation Professional/semiprofessional Skilled worker

Unskilled worker Unemployed

10(16.7)

14(23.3)

21(35.0)

15(25.0)

4. Marital status

Single

Married

29(48.3)

31(51.7)

5. Per capita income

“5000

>5000-10000

>10000-15000

>15000-20000

>20000

17(28.3)

22(36.7)

5( 8.3)

4( 6.7)

12(20.0)

6. Religion

Hindu Muslim Sikh

 

26(43.3)

3(05.0)

31(51.7)

7. Locality

Rural

Urban/Semi urban

 

24(40.0)

36(60.0)

8. Type of family

Nuclear Joint/Extended

 

31(51.7)

29(48.3)

9. Family history of substance abuse 10(16.7)

 

N= 60

months to 30 years. Majority of the

*Mean±SD (range) : Age: 30.45±8.59 years (18-50 years)

Income: Rs.14792.50±18959.33 (1200-100000)

Table 2: Clinical profile of the Participants

N=60

Sl.

No.

Variables n(%)
1. Type of substance abuse

Alcohol Cannabis Opioid

Multiple

17(28.3)

2(03.3)

11(18.4)

30(50.0)

2. Age of starting substance abuse (years)

<18

18-28

>28

15(25.0)

39(65.0)

6(10.0)

3. Duration of substance abuse(years)

Less than 1 year 1-5

>5

4(06.7)

21(35.0)

35(58.3)

4. Frequency of using substance

Everyday

Several times a week

55(91.7)

5(08.3)

5. Money spent per day

<500

501-1000

1001-1500

>1500

26(43.3)

8(13.3)

2(03.4)

24(40.0)

6. Previous history of drug Deaddiction treatment 30(50.0)

Mean±SD (Range): Age of initiation of substance abuse: 22.98±6.04(12-40) Duration= 8.80±7.71 (2 month-30 years)

Mean±SD (Range): Money spent per day= 1984.05±2291.11 (Rs. 3-10000) treatment including inpatient and OPD treatment.

Table 3 depicts that majority of the participants (73%) had moderate self- esteem. only 1 participant had high self- esteem and rest of the participants (25%) had low self esteem.

Table 3: Self esteem of the participants assessed by Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale

 

Self Esteem (score) n (%)
Low (10-20) 15 (25%)
Moderate (20-33) 44 (73.3%)
High (34-40) 1 (1.7%)

The mean score of self-esteem was 22.17±4.49 with a range of 11-34.

Table 4 depicts that majority of the participants (67%) agreed or strongly agreed that they are not satised with themselves. Sixty percent participants felt that they are not able to do things as well as most other people. More than half of the participants (63.33%) said that they think they are no good at all. Seventy percent participants did not have much to be proud of. Almost 89% of them wish to have more respect for them and half of the participants felt that they are failure in their lives. There was no association found between the socio demographic or clinical prole and self esteem of the participants.

Table 4: Individual item wise comparison of Self Esteem of the participants

N=60

Sl.

No.

Items Strongly

agree

Agree Disagree Strongly

disagree

1 On the whole, I am satised with myself. 4( 6.7) 16(26.6) 13(21.7) 27(45.0)
2 At times I think I am no good at all. 30(50.0) 8(13.3) 20(33.3) 2( 3.3)
3 I feel that I have a number of good qualities. 4( 6.7) 35(58.3) 20(33.3) 1( 1.7)
4 I am able to do things as well as most other people. 3(05.0) 21(35.0) 21(35.0) 15(25.0)
5 I feel I do not have much to be proud of. 35(58.3) 7(11.7) 14(23.3) 4(6.7)
6 I certainly feel useless at times. 30(50.0) 13(21.7) 15(25.0) 2(3.3)
7 I feel that I’m a person of worth, at least on an

equal plane with others.

6(10.0) 17(28.3) 16(26.7) 21(35.0)
8 I wish I could have more respect for myself. 53(88.4) 2(3.3) 2(3.3) 3(05.0)
9 All in all, I am inclined to feel that I am a failure. 18(30.0) 12(20.0) 19(31.7) 11(18.3)
10 I take a positive attitude toward myself. 16(26.7) 27(45.0) 10(16.7) 7(11.6)

 

Discussion:

In today’s scenario no part of the world is free from the curse of substance abuse including addiction, dependence and drug trafcking. India is also caught in the vicious cycle of drug abuse and the numbers of drug addiction are increasing day by day. To date, research on self-esteem among the patients with substance abuse is scarce, though available literature is there regarding self- substance abuse over a period of one year. The result depicted that the age of starting substance use was 11- 20 years for majority of the participants (76.8%). The study showed commonly used substances was nicotine (94.4%),  medicinal  opioids  (65.7%), cannabis (63.6%), benzodiazepines (45.5%), other prescription medications (43.4%), alcohol (32.5%), inhalants (11.1%), and cocaine  (7.5%).  Multiple  substance  abuse esteem among specic substance users like was  present  in  91.9%  of  patients.9    In  the alcoholics or cannabis users. So, need was felt to assess the self-esteem of the patients with substance use disorder in the present study. For assessing self-esteem, Rosenberg self- esteem scale was used in this study as this scale is used and recommended in various studies previously.1,2

In the present study the mean age of the substance abusers was 30.45±8.59 and mean age for starting substance abuse was 22.98±6.04. One fourth of the participants reportedly started using substance before the age of 18 years. This nding is similar with the study conducted in Ahmadabad, India with 560 patients with substance use over a period of one month, where the mean age of the participants was 32.8±1.6 years, the mean age for initiation was 23.9±5.63 years and 39.6% patients started using substance at the age of 16-20 years. So, it can be seen that though the initiation of substance abuse starts at a very early age, but the patients come for treatment at later ages. The study results also conclude that adolescents time period is most vulnerable for starting substance abuse. Peer pressure, being one of the major factors for initiating substance abuse at such an earlier age.8

Many studies have reported about multiple substance abuse. A study, that reported such results, was done in Jammu & Kashmir, India on 198 patients with present study the age range of starting substance abuse was 12 years to 40 years. Half of the participants (50%) were multiple substance abusers, 30% are alcohol abusers, 10% only opioid abusers. The mean duration of substance abuse was reported as 8.80±7.71 years with a wide range of 2 months to 30 years. Most of the participants had per capita income of Rs. 1000-10000. A positive family history always inuences the addiction. By following the theory of modeling we can say that by seeing the parenting gures or siblings one develops the habit of substance, though in the present study very few participants (16.7%) reported of having positive family history of substance abuse.

In the present study majority of the participants had low or moderate self-esteem. only one participant showed high self- esteem. This result can be correlated with a descriptive correlation study to predict the tendency of substance abuse on the basis of self-esteem and components of emotional intelligence which revealed that there is a signicant negative relationship between self-esteem and tendency to drug abuse. With 153 participants in the study the mean self- esteem score was found to be 18.73±4.49, as measured by Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale.10 Based on the ndings of the study it is recommended to implement interventions to improve the self-esteem especially of the youth to keep them away from the devil of drug abuse. A person with low self-esteem is afraid of facing the ‘ups and downs’ of life rather like to ‘escape the self’ through many escapist behaviors, substance abuse being one of the important among them. So, by  improving the self-esteem substance abuse can be reduced and nurses working in the psychiatric unit can play an important role here by helping the patients with substance use disorders with the activities to improve self-esteem.

References:

  1. Health topics : Substance abuse. [cited on 2018 Jan 14] available from who.int/topics/substance-abuse/en/
  2. Nadeem A, Rubeena B, Agarwal VK, Kalakoti Substance Abuse in India. Pravara Med Rev 2009; 1(4):4-6 [cited 2018 Jan 14]. Available from: http://www.pravara.com/pmr/pmr-1-4- 2.pdf
  3. Heidari M, Ghodusi M. Relationship of assess self-esteem and locus of control with quality of life during treatment stages in patients referring to drug addiction rehabilitation centers. Materia Socio-Medica. 2016 Jul 24;28(4):263.
  4. Daniel LT, Krishnan G, Gupta S. A study to assess the prevalence and pattern of substance use among male adolescents in suburban area of Delhi. Indian J Soc Psychiatry 2017;33 (3): 208-12 [cited 2019 Mar 28]. Available from: http://www.indjsp.org/article.asp?issn=09 71-9962; year=2017; volume=33; issue=3; spage=208; epage=212; aulast=Daniel
  5. Review of literature.pdf. [cited 2019 Mar 29]. Extent and pattern of Drug Abuse. Available from : https://www.unodc.org/pdf/india/ publications/national_Survey/08_ rev iewoiterature.pd
  1. Mcleod S. Carl Rogers Humanistic Approach. Simply Psychology. [cited on 2019 March 28] available from simplypsychology.org/carl-rogers.html.
  2. Kim E. Drug initiation, addiction and negative self-esteem: Rethinking Kaplan’s Self-derogation theory in the control of Korea based on evidence from United States. [cited on 2019 March 28] available from academia.edu/32870619/Drug-initiation- addiction-and-negative-self esteem- Rethinking_Kaplans_self_derogation_the ory_in_the_contest_of_Korea_based_on _the_evidence_from_United_states.
  1. Kadri AM, Bhagyalaxmi A, Kedia G. A study of socio-demographic prole of substance abusers attending a De- addiction Centre in Ahmedabad India Journal of Community Medicine 2003; 28(2): 74-6, 80.
  2. Rather YH, Bashir W, Sheikh AA, Amin M, Zahgeer Socio-demographic and clinical prole of substance abuse attending a regional Drug De-addiction Centre in Chronic Conict Area: Kashmir India. Malays J Med Sci. May- Jul 2013; 20(3): 31-8.
  3. Nasiri F, Nasiri S, Rodsari AB.The Prediction of Tendency to Substance Abuse on the Basis of Self Esteem and Components of Emotional Intelligence [Internet]. Quarterly Journal of drug Drug Abuse. 2014; 8 (31);104-11[cited 2019 Mar 27]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 303589607_The_Prediction_of_Tendenc y_to_Substance_Abuse_on_the_Basis_of _Self_Esteem_and_Components_of_Em otional_Intelligence